Warner’s Safe Remedies: Benton’s Hair Grower

At some time prior to 1888, Warner acquired the exclusive rights to a product called Benton’s Hair Grower. Unlike his Safe Cures, Tippecanoe and Log Cabin products that appeared in bottles with distinct embossing, Benton’s Hair Grower was packaged in a small, short clear bottle with a wide mouth. The contents of the bottle, which the 1888 Artist’s Album characterized as “a gelatinous substance” looks like a cream colored parafin. And yet, despite the understated appearance, its advertising had that characteristic Warner panache.

According to Warner, Benton’s Hair Grower had been on the market for many years with “hosts of friends” in every section of the Union. The advertising provided the potential user with a timetable of what he (or perhaps she) could expect from the product. Benton’s would remove dandruff (6-14 days), stop hair falling out (14-30 days), start a growth of hair (30-60 days), grow hair 3-6 inches (6 – 12 months), restore hair to original color ( 3 – 6 months), grow hair in 75 out of 100 cases no matter how long bald. In addition, this wonder of medicine was “free from Mineral or Vegetable Poisons” (whatever that means). The package appears to have a “before” and “after” picture as a motivator.

Benton’s was offered in three strengths: single for $1.00, double for $2.00 and triple for $3.00. For those customers cursed with “very tough and hard” skin, the double or triple strength was suggested. Through the courtesy of Jack Stecher, I acquired the above bottle of Benton’s; however, it does not have a label or box, so I cannot tell whether it is the single, double or triple strength. It is unclear how long Warner marketed Benton’s Hair Grower, although one would suspect that it would have competed for the same customers to whom he was trying to sell his Log Cabin Scalpine and Hair Tonic.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Warner’s Safe Remedies: Benton’s Hair Grower

  1. Charlene,

    I’m not sure if Benton’s Hair Grower is still being sold, but my hunch would be that it is not or, if it is, it would not be marketed as a Hair Grower. You pose an excellent question, my interest in it was only because Warner acquired the rights to it during his heyday. Not sure if it was ever spun off or sold after his fortunes took a turn for the worse in the early 1890’s.

    Steve

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s